Investigating the Attitude of Graduate Psychiatrists towards Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and Conventional Clinical Interview Examination
Abstract
Objective: In the present study, we investigated the attitude of psychiatrists who graduated in 2002-2009 towards Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) and conventional clinical interview examination (Individual Patient Assessment).
Method: We studied 134 psychiatrists graduated; half of whom were examined with conventional clinical interview and the others with OSCE. A questionnaire was prepared by a specialist workgroup to assess the participants’ attitude towards the exams. The questionnaire was initially examined in a pilot study. The findings of the questionnaire were used to assess the graduates’ attitude towards each examination, as well as to compare the examinations.
Results: The OSCE group indicated a significantly more positive attitude compared to the conventional group (p = 0.03). Furthermore, the OSCE group believed the role of theoretical knowledge (p = 0.01) and pre-test practice (p = 0.03) to be significantly greater for success compared to the other group. The structure of OSCE wa reported to be superior to conventional examination in terms of fairness and homogeneity (p = 0.004). First participation in exam (p = 0.04) and ultimate success in the exam (p = 0.009) were predictors of graduates’ attitude.
Conclusion: Based on examinees ’attitudes, OSCE may be a more appropriate choice for graduation examinations of psychiatry compared to the conventional clinical interview examination.
Blaskiewicz RJ, Park RS, Chibnall JT , Powell JK. The influence of testing context and clinical rotation order on students' OSCE performance. Acad Med 2004; 79: 597-601.
Chandra PS, Chaturvedi SK, Desai G. Objective standardized clinical assessment with feedback: Adapting the objective structured clinical examination for postgraduate psychiatry training in India. Indian J Med Sci 2009; 63: 235-243.
Hickling FW, Morgan KA, Abel W, Denbow CE, Ali Z, Nicholson GD, et al. A comparison of the objective structured clinical examination results across campuses of the University of the West Indies (2001 and 2002). West Indian Med J 2005; 54: 139-143.
Harden RM, Gleeson FA. Assessment of clinical competence using an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). Med Educ 1979; 13: 41-54.
McNaughton N, Ravitz P, Wadell A , Hodges BD. Psychiatric education and simulation: a review of the literature. Can J Psychiatry 2008; 53: 85-93.
O'Sullivan P, Chao S, Russell M, Levine S , Fabiny A. Development and implementation of an objective structured clinical examination to provide formative feedback on communication and interpersonal skills in geriatric training. J Am Geriatr Soc 2008; 56: 1730-1735.
Park RS, Chibnall JT, Blaskiewicz RJ, Furman GE, Powell JK, Mohr CJ. Construct validity of an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) in psychiatry: associations with the clinical skills examination and other indicators. Acad Psychiatry 2004; 28: 122-128.
Park RS, Chibnall JT, Morrow A. Relationship of rotation timing to pattern of clerkship performance in psychiatry. Acad Psychiatry 2005; 29: 267-273.
Sadeghi M, Taghva A, Mirsepassi G, Hassanzadeh M. How do examiners and examinees think about role-playing of standardized patients in an OSCE setting? Acad Psychiatry 2007; 31: 358-362.
Sauer J, Hodges B, Santhouse A , Blackwood N. The OSCE has landed: One small step for British psychiatry? Acad Psychiatry 2005; 29: 310-315.
Walters K, Osborn D, Raven P. The development, validity and reliability of a multimodality objective structured clinical examination in psychiatry. Med Educ 2005; 39: 292-298.
Whelan P, Church L, Kadry K. Using standardized patients' marks in scoring postgraduate psychiatry OSCEs. Acad Psychiatry 2009; 33: 319-322.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 9 No 2 (2014) | |
Section | Articles | |
Keywords | ||
Objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) axaminees’ attitude clinical interview graduation examinations individual assessment |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |