Original Article

Implementation of the McMaster Model in Family Therapy: Effects on Family Function in Married Couples

Abstract

Objective: Family function is one of the main effective factors on stability of the family. Family therapy can promote family function and performances. This study aimed to assess the effects of family therapy on family function among couples in Yazd province (Iran) based on the McMaster model.

Method: The research population was selected from volunteer couples in Yazd in 2017 who were invited by publicity announcement to participate in this research. Finally, 40 couples were selected and randomly divided into 2 intervention and control groups. Participants responded to the demographic and Family Assessment Device (FAD) questionnaires. The obtained information was investigated using inferential and descriptive statistics and SPSS 21 software.

Results: The results showed significant differences between the intervention and control groups in problem-solving (p = 0.01), communication (p < 0.0001), emotional responsiveness (p = 0.01), emotional involvement (p < 0.0001), and general function (p = 0.04). The roles and behavior control domains were improved after the intervention in 2 groups, but the differences were not significant.

Conclusion: Family therapy based on McMaster model can promote the skills of problem- solving, family communication, emotional responsiveness, emotional involvement, and general function in couples. Healthy family functioning is an important domain of interest for mental health professionals who provide family interventions. Our findings add substantially to family professionals’ knowledge about patterns of family function in Iranian families.

1. Kalmijn M, Uunk W. Regional value differences in Europe and the social consequences of divorce: A test of the stigmatization hypothesis. Social Science Research. 2007;36(2):447-68.
2. Holley P, Yabiku S, Benin M. The relationship between intelligence and divorce. Journal of Family Issues. 2006;27(12):1723-48.
3. Ahluwalia H, Anand T, Suman LN. Marital and family therapy. Indian J Psychiatry. 2018;60(Suppl 4):S501-S5.
4. Varghese M, Kirpekar V, Loganathan S. Family Interventions: Basic Principles and Techniques. Indian J Psychiatry. 2020;62(Suppl 2):S192-S200.
5. Ghanbari Panah A, Sharif Mustaffa M. A Model of Family Functioning Based on Cohesion, Flexibility and Communication across Family Life Cycle in Married Women. International Journal of Psychology. 2019;13(2):195-228.
6. Kitzmann KM, Dalton III WT, Buscemi J. Beyond parenting practices: Family context and the treatment of pediatric obesity. Family Relations. 2008;57(1):13-23.
7. Proulx CM, Snyder LA. Families and health: An empirical resource guide for researchers and practitioners. Family Relations. 2009;58(4):489-504.
8. Sharifi M ,Karasouli S , Beshlideh K .The effectiveness of group attribution retraining in reducing couple burnout and divorce probability in divorce-seeking couples .Journal of Family Counseling & Psychotherapy . 2011; 1(2):212-225. (Persian)
9. Yoosefi N, GhaderMarzi H, Nazaripoor M. The prediction of family functioning basedon spirituality. TebvaTazkiyeh.2014; 22(4): 59-66. (Persian)
10. Pourmovahed Z, Mazloomy Mahmoodabad SS, Zareei Mahmoodabadi H, Tavangar H, Yassini Ardekani SM, Vaezi AA. Deficiency of Self-Efficacy in Problem-Solving as a Contributory Factor in Family Instability: A Qualitative Study. Iran J Psychiatry. 2018;13(1):32-9.
11. Pourmovahed Z., Mazloomy Mahmoodabad S.S., Zareei Mahmoodabadi H., Tavangar H., Yassini Ardekani S.M., Vaezi A.A. Family stability and conflict of spiritual beliefs and superstitions among Yazdi people in Iran: A qualitative study. MEJFM.2017; 15(9):97-103.
12. Mahmoodabadi HZ, Bahrami F, Ahmadi A, Etemadi O, Zadeh MSF. The effectiveness of retraining attribution styles (cognitive therapy) on dimensions of family functioning in divorce applicant couples. International Journal of Psychological Studies. 2012;4(2):257-63.
13. Epstein N B, Baldwin LM, Bishop DS. The MacMaster model of family assessment device. JMFT. 1983; 9(2):171-80.
14. Boterhoven de Haan KL, Hafekost J, Lawrence D, Sawyer MG, Zubrick SR. Reliability and validity of a short version of the general functioning subscale of the McMaster Family Assessment Device. Fam Process. 2015;54(1):116-23.
15. Stevenson-Hinde J, Akister J. The McMaster Model of Family Functioning: observer and parental ratings in a nonclinical sample. Fam Process. 1995;34(3):337-47.
16. Epstein N B, Ryan CE. Bishop D S, Miller IW, Keitner G I. The MacMaster model: A view of healthy family functioning. In. F. Walsh (Ed). Normal family processes (2003 . 3rd ed., pp.581-607). New York:Guilford Press.
17. Shi J, Wang L, Yao Y, Su N, Zhao X, Zhan C. Family Function and Self-esteem among Chinese University Students with and without Grandparenting Experience: Moderating Effect of Social Support. Front Psychol. 2017;8:886.
18. Akbari F, Dehghani M, Khatibi A, Vervoort T. Incorporating Family Function into Chronic Pain Disability: The Role of Catastrophizing. Pain Res Manag. 2016;2016:6838596.
19. Mirzaei Alavijeh M, Nasirzadeh M, Eslami AA, Sharifirad G, Hasanzadeh A. Influence of family function about youth dependence to synthetic drugs. Iranian Journal of Health Education and Health Promotion. 2013;1(2):19-30.
20. Yoosefi N. An investigation of the psychometric properties of the McMaster clinical rating scale (MCRS). Training Measurement .2012; 3(7): 83-112. (Persian)
21. Zadeh Mohammadi A, Male Khosravi G. A preliminary study of validity and psychometric characteristics of family functioning Assessment (FAD). Quarterly of Family Research. 2006;5(2):69-89.
22. Markman HJ, Hahlweg K. The prediction and prevention of marital distress: An international perspective. Clinical psychology review. 1993;13(1):29-43.
23. Baucom DH, Epstein N, Kirby JS, Falconier MK. Couple therapy: Theoretical perspectives and empirical findings. In D.H. Barlow (Ed.), Oxford handbook of clinical psychology. 2011 (pp:789-809). New York: Oxford University Press.
24. Tellado, GS. An evaluation case: The implementation and evaluation of a problem solving training program for adolescents, Evaluation and Program Planning: An International Journal. 1984; 7(2): 179-88.
25. Gottman J M. What predicts divorce? The relationship between marital processes and marital outcomes. 1994 (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum).
26. Robinson E A, Price MG. Pleasurable behavior in marital interaction: An observational study. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1980; 48(1): 117-118.
27. Eidelson RJ, Epstein N. Cognition and relationship maladjustment development of a measure of dysfunctional relationship beliefs. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1982;50(5):715-20.
28. Weiss R L, Heyman R E. A clinical-research overview of couple interactions. NIn W. K. Halford & H. J. Markman (Eds.), Clinical handbook of marriage and couplesinterventions, 1997 (pp:13–41). New York: Wiley.
29. Zanganeh B, Kaboudi M, Ashtarian H, Kaboudi B. The comparison of family function based on the McMaster model in fertile and infertile women. J Med Life. 2015;8(Spec Iss 4):196-202.
30. Fincham FD, Beach SR. Conflict in marraige: implications for working with couples. Annu Rev Psychol. 1999;50:47-77.
31. Deffenbacher J L, Thwaites G A, Wallace T L, Oetting E R. Social skills and cognitive-relaxation approaches to general anger reduction. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 1994; 41(3): 386-396.
32. Dattilio FM, Epstein NB. Introduction to the special section: The role of cognitive-behavioral interventions in couple and family therapy. J Marital Fam Ther. 2005;31(1):7-13.
33. Mousavi S F. The role of family functioning (based on McMaster's model) in predicting attitudes of intimacy &marriage compatibility in families of Qazvin city. Family Counseling and Psychotherapy. 2013; 3(3): 401-419. (Persian).
34. Talebi A, Tabatabaei S. The effect of life skills on family functions with addicted husband. research on addiction. 2011;4(16):25-40.
35. Bradbury TN, Fincham FD. Attributions in marriage: review and critique. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(1):3-33.
36. Horneffer KJ, Fincham FD. Attributional models of depression and marital distress. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 1996;22(7):678-89.
37. Coe JL, Davies PT, Sturge-Apple ML. Family cohesion and enmeshment moderate associations between maternal relationship instability and children's externalizing problems. J Fam Psychol. 2018;32(3):289-98.
38. Zareei Mahmoodabadi H, Zarei F. The Effect of Divorce Counseling based on Gottman's Approach on the Self-Efficacy in Divorce Management of Couples Applying for Divorce. SBRH. 2018; 2 (2):219-27
39. Askarshahi M, Afshani SA, Ardian N, Morowatisharifabad MA, Mazloomy-Mahmoodabad SS, Ehrampoush MH, et al. Determinants of Intention to Divorce Petition Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Health Scope. 2019;8(3).
Files
IssueVol 16 No 1 (2021) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
Published2021-01-30
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v16i1.5380
Keywords
Family Function Family Therapy McMaster Model

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Pourmovahed Z, Yassini Ardekani SM, Mazloomy Mahmoodabad S S, Zareei Mahmoodabadi H. Implementation of the McMaster Model in Family Therapy: Effects on Family Function in Married Couples. Iran J Psychiatry. 16(1):60-67.