Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory-Short Form (FFNI-SF)
Objective: For a long time, it was held that narcissism had two aspects: narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic fragility. The extraversion, neuroticism, and antagonism elements of the three-factor narcissism paradigm, on the other hand, have gained popularity in recent years. Based on the three-factor framework of narcissism, the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory-short form (FFNI-SF) is a relatively recent invention. Therefore, this research aimed to assess the validity and reliability of the FFNI-SF in Persian among Iranians.
Method: Ten specialists (with Ph.D.s in psychology) were enlisted in this research to translate and evaluate the reliability of the Persian version of the FFNI-SF. The Content Validity Index (CVI) and the Content Validity Ratio (CVR) were then used to assess face and content validity. It was given to 430 students at Azad University, Tehran Medical Branch, once the Persian form was completed. The available sampling technique was used to choose the participants. Cronbach's alpha and the test-retest correlation coefficient were used to assess the reliability of the FFNI-SF. In addition, concept validity was obtained using exploratory factor analysis. In addition, correlations with NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) and Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI) were employed to establish the convergent validity of the FFNI-SF.
Results: According to professional opinions, the face and content validity indices met expectations. With Cronbach's alpha and test-retest reliability, the questionnaire's reliability was also established. Cronbach's alphas varied between 0.7 and 0.83 for the FFNI-SF components. According to test-retest reliability coefficients, the components' values varied from 0.7 to 0.86. Additionally, three factors (extraversion, neuroticism, and antagonism) were recovered using the principal components approach and a straight oblimin rotation. According to an analysis of the eigenvalues, the three-factor solution accounted for 49.01 of the variation in the FFNI-SF. The eigenvalues for the three variables were 2.95 (M = 1.39), 2.51 (M = 1.3), and 1.88 (M = 1.24) respectively. The FFNI-SF Persian form's convergent validity was further verified by the association between its results and those from the NEO-FFI and PNI tests and the FFNI-SF. There was a substantial positive association between FFNI-SF Extraversion and NEO Extraversion (r = 0.51, P ≤ 0.001), as well as a strong negative correlation between FFNI-SF antagonism and NEO agreeableness (r = -0.59, P ≤ 0.001). As well as this, PNI grandiose narcissism (r = 0.37, P ≤ 0.001) was shown to be significantly associated with FFNI-SF grandiose narcissism (r = 0.48, P ≤ 0.001), as it was with PNI vulnerable narcissism (r = 0.48, P < 0.001).
Conclusion: with its solid psychometric qualities, we may utilize the Persian FFNI-SF to test the three-factor model of narcissism as an effective tool for research.
2. Miller JD, Campbell WK, Pilkonis PA. Narcissistic personality disorder: relations with distress and functional impairment. Compr Psychiatry. 2007;48(2):170-7.
3. Papageorgiou KA, Malanchini M, Denovan A, Clough PJ, Shakeshaft N, Schofield K, et al. Longitudinal associations between narcissism, mental toughness and school achievement. Pers Individ Dif. 2018;131:105-10.
4. Papageorgiou KA, Wong B, Clough PJ. Beyond good and evil: Exploring the mediating role of mental toughness on the Dark Triad of personality traits. Pers Individ Differ. 2017;119:19-23.
5. Papageorgiou KA, Gianniou F-M, Wilson P, Moneta GB, Bilello D, Clough PJ. The bright side of dark: Exploring the positive effect of narcissism on perceived stress through mental toughness. Pers Individ Dif. 2019;139:116-24.
6. Wink P. Two faces of narcissism. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;61(4):590-7.
7. Miller JD, Hoffman BJ, Gaughan ET, Gentile B, Maples J, Keith Campbell W. Grandiose and vulnerable narcissism: a nomological network analysis. J Pers. 2011;79(5):1013-42.
8. Papageorgiou KA, Denovan A, Dagnall N. The positive effect of narcissism on depressive symptoms through mental toughness: Narcissism may be a dark trait but it does help with seeing the world less grey. Eur Psychiatry. 2019;55:74-9.
9. Crowe ML, Lynam DR, Campbell WK, Miller JD. Exploring the structure of narcissism: Toward an integrated solution. J Pers. 2019;87(6):1151-69.
10. Miller JD, Vize C, Crowe ML, Lynam DR. A Critical Appraisal of the Dark-Triad Literature and Suggestions for Moving Forward. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2019;28(4):353-60.
11. Jones DN, Paulhus DL. Introducing the short Dark Triad (SD3): a brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment. 2014;21(1):28-41.
12. Raskin R, Terry H. A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(5):890-902.
13. Hendin HM, Cheek JM. Assessing Hypersensitive Narcissism: A Reexamination of Murray's Narcism Scale. J Res Pers. 1997;31(4):588-99.
14. Pincus AL, Ansell EB, Pimentel CA, Cain NM, Wright AGC, Levy KN. Initial construction and validation of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory. Psychol Assess. 2009;21(3):365-79.
15. Diguer,L., Turmel,V., Luis,R.D.S., Mathieu, V., Marcoux, L.A.,& Lapointe , T. Development and initial structure analysis of a french version of the pathological narcissism inventory. J Europ Psych. 2014 ;29,1-17.
16. Jakšić N, Milas G, Ivezić E, Wertag A, Jokić-Begić N, Pincus AL. The Pathological Narcissism Inventory (PNI) in Transitional Post-War Croatia: Psychometric and Cultural Considerations. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2014;36(4):640-52.
17. Glover N, Miller JD, Lynam DR, Crego C, Widiger TA. The five-factor narcissism inventory: a five-factor measure of narcissistic personality traits. J Pers Assess. 2012;94(5):500-12.
18. McCrae, R. R, Zonderman, A.B., Costa, P.T., Bond, M.H., & Paunonen, S.V.Evaluating replicability of factors in the revised NEO Personality Inventory:confirmatory factor analysis versus procrustes rotation. J per & soci psychol. 1996; 70,552-66.
19. Ackerman, R.A., Witt, E.A., Donnellan, M.B., Trzeniewski,K.H., Robins,R.W., & Kashy, D.A.what does the narcissistic personlity inventory really measure?J assess.2011;18,67-87.
20. Sherman ED, Miller JD, Few LR, Campbell WK, Widiger TA, Crego C, et al. Development of a Short Form of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory: the FFNI-SF. Psychol Assess. 2015;27(3):1110-6.
21. EKŞİ F. The short form of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory: Psychometric equivalence of the Turkish version. Educ Pract Theory. 2016;16(4).
22. Fossati A, Somma A, Borroni S, Miller JD. Assessing Dimensions of Pathological Narcissism: Psychometric Properties of the Short Form of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory in a Sample of Italian University Students. J Pers Assess. 2018;100(3):250-8.
23. Miller JD, Lynam DR, McCain JL, Few LR, Crego C, Widiger TA, et al. Thinking Structurally About Narcissism: An Examination of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory and Its Components. J Pers Disord. 2016;30(1):1-18.
24. Papageorgiou KA, Denovan A, Dagnall N, Artamonova E. A. Cross-Cultural Investigation of the Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory Short Form: Narcissism as a Multidimensional Trait in the United Kingdom and Russia. J Pers Assess. 2022;104(3):359-67.
25. Anisi J. Validity and reliability of NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) on university students. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2012;5(4):351-5.
26. Soleimani M, Past N, Molaie M, Mohammadi A, Dashtipoor M, Safa Y, & Pincus AL. A Validation Study of the Pathological Narcissism Inventory in a Sample of Iranian’s Students. J Contemp psychol. 2015;10(1):95-110.
27. Miller, J. D., McCain, J. L., Few, L. R., & Campbell, W. K. Thinking structurally about narcissm:An examination of the five-factor narcissm inventory and its components. J Per Dis.2016;29, 177-94.
28. Dai Q, Shimotsukasa T, Oshio A. Short form of the five-factor narcissism inventory: A Japanese adaptation. Cogent Psychol. 2021;8(1):1935533.
29. Smith GT, McCarthy DM, Zapolski TC. On the value of homogeneous constructs for construct validation, theory testing, and the description of psychopathology. Psychol Assess. 2009;21(3):272-84.
|Issue||Vol 18 No 2 (2023)|
|Narcissism Personality Test Personality Assessment Psychometrics|
|Rights and permissions|
|This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|