Uncovering Negative Interpretation Bias in Remitted/Recovered Depression with Laboratory Task
,
Abstract
Objective: Research has demonstrated that individuals with a history of depression engage in complicated strategies (e.g., thought suppression) that may mask the possible existence of major depression. Increasing the mental strain, such as retrieving a six-digit number, may reveal depressive thinking in previously depressed individuals. This study examined the hypothesis that thought suppression could mask a cognitive vulnerability to depression and illustrated how cognitive tasks disrupt mind control.
Method: This case-control study recruited 255 participants with a convenience sampling method conducted at the Razi Educational and Therapeutic Psychiatric Center (Tehran, Iran) in 2021. Participants were divided into five groups, then they were evaluated by a scrambled sentence test (SST) after random assignment to either mental load or no mental load conditions. The number of negative unscrambled statements was used as an index of negative interpretation bias. After gathering data, analysis of variance (ANOVA) for different group factors and conditions was carried out to test the main hypotheses.
Results: The effect of the intervention provided to each group on the score of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HRDS) was significant (F (4, 208) = 511.77, P < 0.001). A significant correlation (r = 0.36, P < 0.01) was found between depression (HDRS) and negative interpretive bias (SST). Analysis of ANOVA has revealed a significant effect on the group (F (4, 412) = 14.94, P < 0.001). The effect of the mental load was not significant (F (4, 412) = 0.09, P = 0.75), but the group × load interaction was significant (F (4, 412) = 5.03, P < 0.001). Post hoc test was used to draw multiple comparisons between the five groups.
Conclusion: The results revealed that people who are vulnerable to depressive disorders are predominantly engaged in thought suppression, which can conceal their depressogenic thinking until cognitive requests consume their mind control efforts.
2. Ferrari AJ, Somerville AJ, Baxter AJ, Norman R, Patten SB, Vos T, et al. Global variation in the prevalence and incidence of major depressive disorder: a systematic review of the epidemiological literature. Psychol Med. 2013;43(3):471-81.
3. Gotlib IH, Joormann J. Cognition and depression: current status and future directions. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2010;6:285-312.
4. Mathews A, MacLeod C. Cognitive vulnerability to emotional disorders. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2005;1:167-95.
5. Everaert J, Tierens M, Uzieblo K, Koster EH. The indirect effect of attention bias on memory via interpretation bias: evidence for the combined cognitive bias hypothesis in subclinical depression. Cogn Emot. 2013;27(8):1450-9.
6. Beck AT, Haigh EA. Advances in cognitive theory and therapy: the generic cognitive model. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:1-24.
7. Ingram RE, Miranda J, Segal ZV. Cognitive vulnerability to depression. Guilford Press New York; 1998.
8. Blanchette I, Richards A. The influence of affect on higher level cognition: A review of research on interpretation, judgement, decision making and reasoning. Cogn Emot. 2010;24(4):561-95.
9. Wisco BE. Depressive cognition: self-reference and depth of processing. Clin Psychol Rev. 2009;29(4):382-92.
10. Foland-Ross LC, Gotlib IH. Cognitive and neural aspects of information processing in major depressive disorder: an integrative perspective. Front Psychol. 2012;3:489.
11. Everaert J, Vrijsen JN, Martin-Willett R, van de Kraats L, Joormann J. A meta-analytic review of the relationship between explicit memory bias and depression: Depression features an explicit memory bias that persists beyond a depressive episode. Psychological Bulletin. 2022 May;148(5-6):435.
12. Amir N, Bomyea J, Beard C. The effect of single-session interpretation modification on attention bias in socially anxious individuals. J Anxiety Disord. 2010;24(2):178-82.
13. Nejati V, Fathi E, Shahidi S, Salehinejad MA. Cognitive training for modifying interpretation and attention bias in depression: Relevance to mood improvement and implications for cognitive intervention in depression. Asian J Psychiatr. 2019;39:23-8.
14. Romero N, Sanchez A, Vazquez C. Memory biases in remitted depression: the role of negative cognitions at explicit and automatic processing levels. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2014;45(1):128-35.
15. Miranda J, Persons JB, Byers CN. Endorsement of dysfunctional beliefs depends on current mood state. J Abnorm Psychol. 1990;99(3):237-41.
16. Hedlund S, Rude SS. Evidence of latent depressive schemas in formerly depressed individuals. J Abnorm Psychol. 1995;104(3):517-25.
17. Wegner DM. Ironic processes of mental control. Psychol Rev. 1994;101(1):34-52.
18. Wenzlaff RM, Wegner DM. Thought suppression. Annu Rev Psychol. 2000;51:59-91.
19. Würtz F, Zahler L, Blackwell SE, Margraf J, Bagheri M, Woud ML. Scrambled but valid? The scrambled sentences task as a measure of interpretation biases in psychopathology: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2022;93:102133.
20. Cash P, Isaksson O, Maier A, Summers J. Sampling in design research: Eight key considerations. Design studies. 78:101077.
21. de Zwart PL, Jeronimus BF, de Jonge P. Empirical evidence for definitions of episode, remission, recovery, relapse and recurrence in depression: a systematic review. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019;28(5):544-62.
22. Möller H, Riedel M, Seemüller F. Relapse or recurrence in depression: why has the cutoff been set at 6 months. Medicographia. 2011;33(2):125-31.
23. Association D-AP. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Arlington: American Psychiatric Publishing. 2013.
24. Soltani S, Newman K, Quigley L, Fernandez A, Dobson K, Sears C. Temporal changes in attention to sad and happy faces distinguish currently and remitted depressed individuals from never depressed individuals. Psychiatry Res. 2015;230(2):454-63.
25. Ebrahimi A, Neshatdoost HT, Mousavi SG, Asadollahi GA, Nasiri H. Controlled randomized clinical trial of spirituality integrated psychotherapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy and medication intervention on depressive symptoms and dysfunctional attitudes in patients with dysthymic disorder. Advanced biomedical research. 2013;2.
26. Watkins ER, Moulds M. Revealing negative thinking in recovered major depression: a preliminary investigation. Behav Res Ther. 2007;45(12):3069-76.
27. Wenzlaff RM, Bates DE. Unmasking a cognitive vulnerability to depression: how lapses in mental control reveal depressive thinking. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998;75(6):1559-71.
28. Novović Z, Mihić L, Biro M, Tovilović S. Measuring vulnerability to depression: The Serbian scrambled sentences test-SSST. Psihologija. 2014;47(1):33-48.
29. Baruch N, Behrman S, Wilkinson P, Bajorek T, Murphy SE, Browning M. Negative bias in interpretation and facial expression recognition in late life depression: A case control study. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2021;36(9):1450-9.
30. Nikolin S, Tan YY, Schwaab A, Moffa A, Loo CK, Martin D. An investigation of working memory deficits in depression using the n-back task: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2021;284:1-8.
31. Rude SS, Durham-Fowler JA, Baum ES, Rooney SB, Maestas KL. Self-report and cognitive processing measures of depressive thinking predict subsequent major depressive disorder. Cognit Ther Res. 2010;34(2):107-15.
32. Wenzlaff RM, Wegner DM, Klein SB. The role of thought suppression in the bonding of thought and mood. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991;60(4):500.
33. Hartlage S, Alloy LB, Vázquez C, Dykman B. Automatic and effortful processing in depression. Psychol Bull. 1993;113(2):247-78.
| Files | ||
| Issue | Vol 18 No 2 (2023) | |
| Section | Original Article(s) | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v18i2.12367 | |
| Keywords | ||
| Bias Depressive Disorder Interpretation Remission Vulnerability | ||
| Rights and permissions | |
|
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
