Editorial

An Increased Need to Identify Protective Factors for Sexual Assault

Abstract

Sexual assault is a pervasive and serious problem characterized by forced sexual contact between individuals by means of intimidation, threats, or fear (1). Several studies have indicated that 17–25% of women and 1–3% of men have experienced sexual assault in their lifetime in the United States (2). The Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW) reported that an estimated 7.9 million (16.6%) adults aged 16 years and over had experienced sexual assault since the age of 16 years for the year ending March 2022 (3). A systematic review estimated the prevalence of sexual harassment in low and middle income countries and reported prevalence rates ranging from 0.6% to 26.1% in studies that used the direct query method, and from 14.5% to 98.8% among studies that used questions based on behavioral acts (4). Different mental problems such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), anxiety, depression, substance use, suicide ideation or attempt, or psychosomatic complaints have been observed among victims of sexual assault (2, 5). A systematic review and meta-analysis reported alcohol consumption as the most common risk factor of sexual violence perpetrated by men against women at higher education institution. Also, hostility toward women, delinquency, fraternity membership, history of sexual violence perpetration, rape myth acceptance, age at first sex, and peer approval of sexual violence were other risk factors (6). Ullman and Najdowski (2011) considered three levels of factors for sexual assault, including macro-level structures, meso-level situations, and micro-level individual factors. However, several studies reported the protective factors to reduce women’s risk of being sexually assaulted. For example, bystander intervention, social support and social integration, avoiding risk behaviors, sexual assertiveness, resistance and self-defense, and coping strategies can protect women from being victimized (7).

1. Sachs CJ, Ladd M, Chapman J. Sexual Assault History and Physical. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL) ineligible companies. Disclosure: Megan Ladd declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies. Disclosure: Jennifer Chapman declares no relevant financial relationships with ineligible companies.: StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2024.
2. Dworkin ER. Risk for Mental Disorders Associated with Sexual Assault: A Meta-Analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2020;21(5):1011-28.
3. Elkin M. Sexual offences prevalence and trends, England and Wales: year ending March 2022. Office for National Statistic; 2023.
4. Ranganathan M, Wamoyi J, Pearson I, Stöckl H. Measurement and prevalence of sexual harassment in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11(6): e047473.
5. Mason F, Lodrick Z. Psychological consequences of sexual assault. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2013;27(1):27-37.
6. Steele B, Martin M, Yakubovich A, Humphreys DK, Nye E. Risk and Protective Factors for Men's Sexual Violence Against Women at Higher Education Institutions: A Systematic and Meta-Analytic Review of the Longitudinal Evidence. Trauma Violence Abuse. 2022;23(3):716-32.
7. Ullman SE, Najdowski CJ. Vulnerability and protective factors for sexual assault. 2011.
8. DeGue S, Valle LA, Holt MK, Massetti GM, Matjasko JL, Tharp AT. A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggress Violent Behav. 2014;19(4):346-62.
9. Kettrey HH, Marx RA. Does the Gendered Approach of Bystander Programs Matter in the Prevention of Sexual Assault Among Adolescents and College Students? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48(7):2037-53.
10. Fairweather A, Kingston DA, Lalumière ML. Nudity as a Disinhibiting Cue in a Date Rape Analogue. Arch Sex Behav. 2016;45(4):821-8.
11. Lykins AD, Cantor JM, Kuban ME, Blak T, Dickey R, Klassen PE, et al. Sexual arousal to female children in gynephilic men. Sex Abuse. 2010;22(3):279-89.
12. Hodge DR, Husain A, Zidan T. Hijab and Depression: Does the Islamic Practice of Veiling Predict Higher Levels of Depressive Symptoms? Soc Work. 2017;62(3):243-50.
13. Jasperse M, Ward C, Jose PE. Identity, perceived religious discrimination, and psychological well‐being in Muslim immigrant women. Applied Psychology. 2012;61(2):250-71.
14. Eaton NR. Hijab, religiosity, and psychological wellbeing of Muslim women in the United States. Journal of Muslim Mental Health. 2015;9(2).
15. Kiani Q, Rasouli N, Jafari S. Structural Equation Modeling the Effect of Mental Health on Attitude toward Hijab with Mediating Psychological Capital, Adaptability and Family Confidence at undergraduate students. Preventive Counseling. 2021;2(1):41-57.
Files
IssueVol 19 No 3 (2024) QRcode
SectionEditorial
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v19i3.15801
Keywords
Editorial Protective facto Sexual assault

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Salmanian M. An Increased Need to Identify Protective Factors for Sexual Assault. Iran J Psychiatry. 2024;19(3):252-253.