Aging Enjoyment: A Grounded Theory Study
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the factors contributing to enjoyment in old age.
Method: To this end, this research used a qualitative exploratory research design known as grounded-theory research. Seventeen elderly participants (aged 65-85 years), comprising 11 men and 6 women, were selected using purposive sampling. A semi-structured interview was used as the data collection instrument. The method proposed by Corbin and Strauss was employed to design the interview questions. In this study, data analysis was interpretive using phenomenological analysis, which was done through open, axial, and selective coding.
Results: The results indicated that the new emergent construct – ageing enjoyment – consisted of five categories and 19 subcategories. These categories include present moment awareness, liberating past, psychosocial safety, ultimate purpose for being, and self-peace. Subcategories include: Vitality, Family solidarity and intimacy, Occupational Adequacy, Economic wisdom, Social Acceptability, Healthy society, Talent flourish, productive experiences, Physical well-being, Willingness to develop, Mindfulness, satisfaction, Moralization, Adaptability, Benevolence, Acceptance, Desire to live, Meaningfulness, Religiosity.
Conclusion: These categories suggest that present moment awareness, liberating past, as well as having psychosocial safety help the elderly experience ageing enjoyment. Hence, they are likely to reach self-peace through an ultimate purpose for being as they deal with challenging life issues. Practical implications of the findings are further discussed.
2. Global age-sex-specific fertility, mortality, healthy life expectancy (HALE), and population estimates in 204 countries and territories, 1950-2019: a comprehensive demographic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10258):1160-203.
3. Mehri N, Messkoub M, Kunkel S. Trends, determinants and the implications of population aging in Iran. Ageing Int. 2020;45(4):327-43.
4. Lester PE, Dharmarajan TS, Weinstein E. The Looming Geriatrician Shortage: Ramifications and Solutions. J Aging Health. 2020;32(9):1052-62.
5. Kotsani M, Kravvariti E, Avgerinou C, Panagiotakis S, Bograkou Tzanetakou K, Antoniadou E, et al. The Relevance and Added Value of Geriatric Medicine (GM): Introducing GM to Non-Geriatricians. J Clin Med. 2021;10(14).
6. Seligman ME, Csikszentmihalyi M. Positive psychology. An introduction. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):5-14.
7. Levy B. Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996;71(6):1092-107.
8. Levy BR, Slade MD, Kunkel SR, Kasl SV. Longevity increased by positive self-perceptions of aging. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2002;83(2):261-70.
9. Hill RD. A positive aging framework for guiding geropsychology interventions. Behav Ther. 2011;42(1):66-77.
10. Urtamo A, Jyväkorpi SK, Strandberg TE. Definitions of successful ageing: a brief review of a multidimensional concept. Acta Biomed. 2019;90(2):359-63.
11. Foster L, Walker A. Active Ageing across the Life Course: Towards a Comprehensive Approach to Prevention. Biomed Res Int. 2021;2021:6650414.
12. Menassa M, Stronks K, Khatmi F, Roa Díaz ZM, Espinola OP, Gamba M, et al. Concepts and definitions of healthy ageing: a systematic review and synthesis of theoretical models. EClinicalMedicine. 2023; 56:101821.
13. Lin K, Ning Y, Mumtaz A, Li H. Exploring the Relationships Between Four Aging Ideals: A Bibliometric Study. Front Public Health. 2021;9:762591.
14. Seligman ME. Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment: Simon and Schuster; 2002.
15. Fest GJ, Roberts T-A, Feist J. Theories of personality: McGraw-Hill Education; 2021.
16. LeCompte MD, Preissle J, Tesch R. Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research: Academic Press; 1993.
17. Havighurst RJ. Successful aging. Processes of aging: Social and psychological perspectives. 1963;1:299-320.
18. Tornstam L. Gerotranscendence: A developmental theory of positive. aging. 2005;11:213.
19. Organization WH. Active ageing—a policy framework. A contribution of the World Health Organisation to the Second United Nations World Assembly on Ageing. Madrid (ES). 2002.
20. Flood M. A mid-range nursing theory of successful aging. Journal of Theory Construction & Testing. 2005;9(2).
21. Montoro-Rodriguez J, Hayslip B, Jr., Ramsey J, Jooste JL. The Utility of Solution-Oriented Strategies to Support Grandparents Raising Grandchildren. J Aging Health. 2021;33(9):647-60.
22. Erikson EH, Erikson JM, Kivnick HQ. Vital involvement in old age: WW Norton & Company; 1994.
23. Ryff CD, Keyes CL. The structure of psychological well-being revisited. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1995;69(4):719-27.
24. Zanjari N, Sharifian Sani M, Chavoshi MH, Rafiey H, Mohammadi Shahboulaghi F. Successful aging as a multidimensional concept: An integrative review. Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2017;31:100.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 19 No 1 (2024) | |
Section | Original Article(s) | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v19i1.14338 | |
Keywords | ||
Aging Enjoyment Psychosocial Support Awareness Qualitative Research |
Rights and permissions | |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |