Original Article

The Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Emotional Abuse Questionnaire

Abstract

Objective: Intimate partner emotional abuse is a serious issue that can lead to catastrophic outcomes for victims. Emotional abuse involves psychological tactics to control, manipulate, and degrade a person within an intimate relationship. This research aimed to translate the Emotional Abuse Questionnaire (EAQ) developed by Jacobson and Gottman into Persian for use among Iranian university students.

Method: The translation of the 66-item EAQ involved a meticulous forward and backward translation process, linguistic matching, and a pilot review. In this cross-sectional study, 346 university students from Rasht, Iran, completed the EAQ. The mean age of participants was 26.78 ± 8.10 years, with most being female (89.0%). Reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and test-retest analysis while content and face validity were assessed by a panel of experts. Construct validity was examined through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and internal consistency measures. Divergent validity was assessed by comparing the EAQ with the ENRICH Marital Satisfaction Scale (EMS).

Results: Impact scores for face validity ranged from 2.33 to 3.92, based on respondents' ratings of frequency and importance. Content validity assessment led to removing four items with a CVR below 0.62, resulting in 62 valid items. The EAQ showed strong internal consistency, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.97, exceeding the acceptable threshold of 0.70. CFA results confirmed the validity of the second-order factor model of the EAQ (χ2/df = 4.34, CFI = 0.95, RMSEA = 0.098, SRMR = 0.077). The EAQ demonstrated a strong correlation with EMS measures, confirming divergent validity.

Conclusion: The Persian version of the EAQ is a reliable instrument for assessing emotional abuse among Iranian university students. Future research should explore the cultural sensitivity of the questionnaire and investigate associations between emotional abuse and other variables of interest, such as mental health outcomes or relationship dynamics. These avenues promise valuable insights into the frequency and effects of emotional abuse across diverse cultural contexts.

1. Petric D. Psychology of Abusive Human Behavior. Open J Med Psychol. 2022;11(2):29-38.
2. van Wormer KS, Bartollas C. Intimate Partner Violence. Women and the Criminal Justice System. UK: Routledge; 2021:279-327.
3. Bates EA. “Walking on egg shells”: A qualitative examination of men’s experiences of intimate partner violence. Psychol Men Masculinities 2020;21(1):13.
4. McHugh MC, Rakowski S, Swiderski C. Men’s Experience of Psychological Abuse: Conceptualization and Measurement Issues. Sex roles. 2013;69(3-4):168-81.
5. Karakurt G. Women’s Psychological Abuse of Male Intimate Partners. The SAGE Handbook of Domestic Violence. 2020:255.
6. Effects of psychological abuse on women’s self-esteem and dating relationships. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Approaches in Psychology. 2024;2(4):291-309.
7. Radell ML, Abo Hamza EG, Daghustani WH, Perveen A, Moustafa AA. The Impact of Different Types of Abuse on Depression. Depress Res Treat. 2021:6654503.
8. Moulding N, Franzway S, Wendt S, Zufferey C, Chung D. Rethinking Women's Mental Health After Intimate Partner Violence. Violence Against Women. 2021;27(8):1064-90.
9. Stark E, Flitcraft A. Women at risk: Domestic violence and women's health: Sage Publications; 1996.
10. Devries KM, Mak JY, García-Moreno C, Petzold M, Child JC, Falder G, et al. Global health. The global prevalence of intimate partner violence against women. Science. 2013;340(6140):1527-8.
11. Karakurt G, Smith D, Whiting J. Impact of Intimate Partner Violence on Women's Mental Health. J Fam Violence. 2014;29(7):693-702.
12. Bonomi AE, Anderson ML, Nemeth J, Bartle-Haring S, Buettner C, Schipper D. Dating violence victimization across the teen years: abuse frequency, number of abusive partners, and age at first occurrence. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:637.
13. Brewer NQ, Thomas KA. Intimate partner violence and academic performance: the role of physical, mental, behavioral, and financial health. Soc Work Health Care. 2019;58(9):854-69.
14. Dye HL. Is Emotional Abuse As Harmful as Physical and/or Sexual Abuse? J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2020;13(4):399-407.
15. Vidourek RA. Emotional abuse: Correlates to abuse among college students. J Aggression Maltreat Trauma. 2017;26(7):792-803.
16. Kumar A, Deb S, Bhagyalakshmi K. Impact of Abuse on Mental Health and Happiness Among Students: Mediating Role of Family Environment. J Indian Assoc Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2023;19(3):266-72.
17. Vidourek RA. Emotional abuse: Correlates to abuse among college students. J Aggression Maltreat Trauma. 2017;26(7):792-803.
18. Heron RL, Eisma MC. Barriers and facilitators of disclosing domestic violence to the healthcare service: A systematic review of qualitative research. Health Soc Care Community. 2021;29(3):612-30.
19. Mirpour Z, Rahmani M, Ghorbanshiroodi S. Explaining the concept of re-experiencing abusive relationships. J Holist Nurs Midwifery. 2021;31(2):124-34.
20. Mirpour Zs, Shafiei Rezvani Nejad K. Prevention of Re-experiencing Abusive Relationships: Effectiveness of Transdiagnostic Intervention Package. [Manuscript submitted for publication]. 2024.
21. Adjei SB. Partner Dependency and Intimate Partner Abuse: A Sociocultural Grounding of Spousal Abuse in Ghana. Psychol Stud. 2015;60(4):422-7.
22. Pokharel B, Hegadoren K, Papathanassoglou E. Factors influencing silencing of women who experience intimate partner violence: An integrative review. Aggress Violent Behav. 2020;52:101422.
23. Jacobson NS, Gottman JM. When men batter women: New insights into ending abusive relationships: Simon and Schuster; 1998.
24. Karakurt G, Ergüner-Tekinalp B, Terzi Ş. The Psychometric Qualities of the Turkish Version of Emotional Abuse Questionnaire. Eurasian J Educ Res. 2009(36):7-22.
25. Gunawan J, Marzilli C, Aungsuroch Y. Establishing appropriate sample size for developing and validating a questionnaire in nursing research. Belitung Nurs J. 2021;7(5):356-60.
26. Counselor’s manual for PREPARE/ENRICH. Revised edition. Minneapolis: PREPARE/ENRICH; 1987.
27. Arab Alidousti A, Nakhaee N, Khanjani N. Reliability and validity of the Persian versions of the ENRICH marital satisfaction (brief version) and Kansas Marital Satisfaction Scales. Health and Development Journal. 2015;4(2):158-67.
28. Brislin RW. Translation and content analysis of oral and written materials. Methodol. 1980:389-444.
29. Nunnally J, Bernstein I. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
30. Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155-63.
31. Novin MH, Farzadfar F, Pashaei T, Razaghi E. Cross-Culture Adaptation and Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Duke Health Profile. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2020;14(4):e102765.
32. Hardesty DM, Bearden WO. The use of expert judges in scale development: Implications for improving face validity of measures of unobservable constructs. J Bus Res. 2004;57(2):98-107.
33. Saneii SH, Heidari M, Zaree M, Akbarfahimi M. Psychometric features of the Persian version of the fatigue impact scale in Iranian stroke patients. J Adv Med Biomed Res. 2020;28(127):111-8.
34. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2006;29(5):489-97.
35. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psycho. 1975;28(4):563-75.
36. Hassan ZA, Schattner P, Mazza D. Doing A Pilot Study: Why Is It Essential? Malays Fam Physician. 2006;1(2-3):70-3.
37. Bentler PM. Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull. 1990;107(2):238-46.
38. Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic concepts, applications, and programming: Sage; 1994.
39. McDonald RP, Ho MH. Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol Methods. 2002;7(1):64-82.
40. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications; 2023.
41. Karakurt G, Silver KE. Emotional abuse in intimate relationships: the role of gender and age. Violence Vict. 2013;28(5):804-21.
42. Follingstad DR, Coyne S, Gambone L. A representative measure of psychological aggression and its severity. Violence Vict. 2005;20(1):25-38.
43. Swadley RL. Returning to abusive relationships: Related and predictive factors. [master’s thesis]. Springfield (MO): Missouri State University; 2017.
44. Engel B. The emotionally abusive relationship: How to stop being abused and how to stop abusing: John Wiley & Sons; 2023.
45. Follingstad DR, Rutledge LL, Berg BJ, Hause ES, Polek DS. The role of emotional abuse in physically abusive relationships. J Fam Violence. 1990;5:107-20.
46. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling: Guilford publications; 2023.
47. Sharma S, Mukherjee S, Kumar A, Dillon WR. A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. J Bus Res. 2005;58(7):935-43.
48. Waltz J, Babcock JC, Jacobson NS, Gottman JM. Testing a typology of batterers. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000;68(4):658-69.
49. Fernandez MC. Immigrant mothers in abusive relationships: Decisions and actions: University of Miami; 2015.
Files
IssueVol 19 No 4 (2024) QRcode
SectionOriginal Article(s)
DOI https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v19i4.16553
Keywords
Dating Violence Emotional Abuse Intimate Partner Abuse Psychological Abuse Psychometrics
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Shafiei Rezvani Nejad K, Mirpour ZS, Novin MH, Najafi Chenari A, Jafaryparvar Z. The Psychometric Properties of the Persian Version of Emotional Abuse Questionnaire. Iran J Psychiatry. 2024;19(4):402-411.