The Validation of the Persian Version of Sugar Addiction Questionnaire: Factor Structure, Item Analysis and Model Fit
Abstract
Objective: Excessive sugar consumption is a growing public health concern, with research suggesting it may function as an addictive substance. However, the lack of standardized tools to assess sugar addiction, particularly across cultures, remains a challenge. This study aims to validate the Persian version of the Sugar Addiction Questionnaire (SAQ) for use in Iran.
Method: In this cross-sectional psychometric validation study, 504 Persian-speaking adults (59.1% female, mean age = 29.8 ± 19.5 years) were recruited using convenience sampling from Tehran health centers. Participants completed the SAQ and Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS 2.0), and participated in DSM-5-based semi-structured interviews for sugar addiction. Factor analysis and reliability measures (Cronbach’s alpha, test-retest, split-half) were used to assess the SAQ's validity and reliability.
Results: The Persian SAQ demonstrated strong psychometric properties. Factor analysis revealed a five-factor structure explaining 45.08% of the variance. Concurrent validity was confirmed by significant correlations with the YFAS 2.0 (r = 0.51, P < 0.001) and BMI (r = 0.55, P < 0.001). The scale showed a good model fit (CFI = 0.91, RMSEA = 0.08), with acceptable reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.79) and a test-retest correlation of 0.54. The optimal cutoff for diagnosing sugar addiction was 9, with the Area-Under-the-Curve (AUC) of 98%.
Conclusion: The Persian version of the SAQ is a reliable and valid tool for assessing sugar addiction in Iran. This validated instrument can improve the diagnosis and understanding of sugar-related behavioral issues, supporting better public health strategies for managing excessive sugar consumption.
2. WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee. Guideline: Sugars Intake for Adults and Children. Geneva: World Health Organization Copyright © World Health Organization, 2015.; 2015.
3. Abdi F, ATARODI KZ, Mirmiran P, Esteki T. Surveying global and Iranian food consumption patterns: A review of the literature. 2015.
4. Huang Y, Chen Z, Chen B, Li J, Yuan X, Li J, et al. Dietary sugar consumption and health: umbrella review. Bmj. 2023;381:e071609.
5. Makarem N, Bandera EV, Lin Y, Jacques PF, Hayes RB, Parekh N. Consumption of Sugars, Sugary Foods, and Sugary Beverages in Relation to Adiposity-Related Cancer Risk in the Framingham Offspring Cohort (1991-2013). Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2018;11(6):347-58.
6. Prada M, Saraiva M, Garrido MV, Sério A, Teixeira A, Lopes D, et al. Perceived Associations between Excessive Sugar Intake and Health Conditions. Nutrients. 2022;14(3):640.
7. Xiong J, Wang L, Huang H, Xiong S, Zhang S, Fu Q, et al. Association of sugar consumption with risk of depression and anxiety: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Nutr. 2024;11:1472612.
8. DiNicolantonio JJ, O'Keefe JH, Wilson WL. Sugar addiction: is it real? A narrative review. Br J Sports Med. 2018;52(14):910-3.
9. Avena NM, Rada P, Hoebel BG. Evidence for sugar addiction: behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(1):20-39.
10. Westwater ML, Fletcher PC, Ziauddeen H. Sugar addiction: the state of the science. Eur J Nutr. 2016;55(Suppl 2):55-69.
11. Wiss DA, Avena N, Rada P. Sugar Addiction: From Evolution to Revolution. Front Psychiatry. 2018;9:545.
12. Pursey KM, Yokum S, Brain K, Burrows T. Neural Responses in Addictive Eating: a Systematic Review. Current Addiction Reports. 2024;11(2):173-90.
14. Meule A, Gearhardt AN. Food addiction in the light of DSM-5. Nutrients. 2014;6(9):3653-71.
15. Falbe J, Thompson HR, Patel A, Madsen KA. Potentially addictive properties of sugar-sweetened beverages among adolescents. Appetite. 2019;133:130-7.
16. Rosa MACd, Gomes CMA, Rocha NSd, Kessler FHP, Slavutzky SMBd, Pechansky F. Dependence module of the MINI plus adapted for sugar dependence: psychometric properties. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica. 2013;26:77-86.
17. Fromm SP, Horstmann A. Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Dietary Fat and Free Sugar-Short Questionnaire. Obes Facts. 2019;12(5):518-28.
18. Avena NM, Rada P, Hoebel BG. Evidence for sugar addiction: behavioral and neurochemical effects of intermittent, excessive sugar intake. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2008;32(1):20-39.
19. Kiwanuka SN, Astrøm AN, Trovik TA. Sugar snack consumption in Ugandan schoolchildren: Validity and reliability of a food frequency questionnaire. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006;34(5):372-80.
20. Gearhardt AN, Corbin WR, Brownell KD. Preliminary validation of the Yale Food Addiction Scale. Appetite. 2009;52(2):430-6.
21. Fawzy N, El-Deen DS. Assessment of Sugar Addiction among Non-Diabetic Patients. Novelty Journals. 2018;5(3).
22. Amerzadeh M, Takian A, Pouraram H, Akbari Sari A, Ostovar A. Economic barriers and gaps to reach the desirable consumption of salt, sugar, and fat in Iran: a qualitative study. J Health Popul Nutr. 2023;42(1):8.
23. Amerzadeh M, Takian A, Pouraram H, Sari AA, Ostovar A. Policy analysis of socio-cultural determinants of salt, sugar and fat consumption in Iran. BMC Nutr. 2022;8(1):26.
24. Gearhardt AN, Corbin WR, Brownell KD. Development of the Yale Food Addiction Scale Version 2.0. Psychol Addict Behav. 2016;30(1):113-21.
25. Haghighinejad H, Tarakemehzadeh M, Jafari P, Jafari M, Ramzi M, Hedayati A. Persian Version of the Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0: Psychometric Analysis and Setting Cutoff Point for the Food Cravings Questionnaire-Trait-Reduced. Psychiatry Investig. 2021;18(3):179-86.
26. Niroumand Sarvandani M, Asadi M, Khosravi F, Gearhardt AN, Razmhosseini M, Soleimani M, et al. Validation and Psychological Properties of the Persian Version of DSM 5 Yale Food Addiction Scale 2.0 (PYFAS 2.0) in Non-clinical Population. Addict Health. 2022;14(3):175-84.
27. Peele S, Brodsky, A. Love and Addiction. New York: Taplinger; 1975. Available in: Love and Addiction: 4. "Love" as an Addiction
28. Alavi SS, Ferdosi M, Jannatifard F, Eslami M, Alaghemandan H, Setare M. Behavioral Addiction versus Substance Addiction: Correspondence of Psychiatric and Psychological Views. Int J Prev Med. 2012;3(4):290-4.
29. Sussman S. The Cambridge handbook of substance and behavioral addictions: Cambridge University Press; 2020.
30. Kim HY. Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis. Restor Dent Endod. 2013;38(1):52-4.
31. Ferguson E, Cox T. Exploratory factor analysis: A users’ guide. International journal of selection and assessment. 1993;1(2):84-94.
32. Lawshe C. A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity. Personnel psychology/Berrett-Koehler Publishers. 1975.
33. Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of applied psychology. 1993;78(1):98.
34. Polit DF. Getting serious about test-retest reliability: a critique of retest research and some recommendations. Qual Life Res. 2014;23(6):1713-20.
35. Bray GA, Nielsen SJ, Popkin BM. Consumption of high-fructose corn syrup in beverages may play a role in the epidemic of obesity. Am J Clin Nutr. 2004;79(4):537-43.
36. Lustig RH, Schmidt LA, Brindis CD. Public health: The toxic truth about sugar. Nature. 2012;482(7383):27-9.
37. Bowen DJ, Grunberg NE. Variations in food preference and consumption across the menstrual cycle. Physiol Behav. 1990;47(2):287-91.
38. Farahmand M, Tehrani FR, Amiri P, Azizi F. Barriers to healthy nutrition: perceptions and experiences of Iranian women. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:1064.
39. Graves BS, Hall ME, Dias-Karch C, Haischer MH, Apter C. Gender differences in perceived stress and coping among college students. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0255634.
40. Orsini CA, Brown TE, Hodges TE, Alonso-Caraballo Y, Winstanley CA, Becker JB. Neural Mechanisms Mediating Sex Differences in Motivation for Reward: Cognitive Bias, Food, Gambling, and Drugs of Abuse. J Neurosci. 2022;42(45):8477-87.
41. Feraco A, Armani A, Amoah I, Guseva E, Camajani E, Gorini S, et al. Assessing gender differences in food preferences and physical activity: a population-based survey. Front Nutr. 2024;11:1348456.
42. Warren A. The relationship between gender differences in dietary habits, neuroinflammation, and Alzheimer's disease. Front Aging Neurosci. 2024;16:1395825.
Files | ||
Issue | Vol 20 No 2 (2025) | |
Section | Original Article(s) | |
Keywords | ||
Addictive Behavioral Addiction Psychometrics Questionnaires Sugars Validation Study |
Rights and permissions | |
![]() |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |