Articles

Using Paradox in Family Therapy among Iranian Families: A Case Report

Abstract

Objective: This study assessed the effect of paradox in family therapy.Paradox, as a therapeutic tool, has been developed by a number of therapists,especially Mara Selvini Palazzoli.
Metho d: This study benefited from the Milan Systems Approach to family. Two clients (both females) were selected for this study. These two girls were the symptomatic members of their families. The families participated in 16 sessions of the therapies. Then, they were followed up for two years. All the family members filled the FAD and BDI questionnaires prior to the therapy, in the tenth session, after the therapy and three months later.
Results:
Results showed that in appropriate cases paradox had a satisfactory outcome. This method reduced the symptomatic behavior, and affected family system as a whole and also helped the family system to become more practical and functional. Case #1 was depressed and on medication for four years prior to the start of the family therapy. Two years later, she recovered and got married. Case #2, was also depressed. After the therapy, she did not need to take medication; she finished high school and entered university.
onclusion:
Paradox is a powerful tool for family therapy. It is a creative and critical solution for long-term illnesses. However, we should keep in mind that this technique should be used as the last option in the course of family therapy and only after other techniques failed to be effective. Caution should be taken when using this technique in therapy.

Bateson G. A theory of play and fantasy; a report on theoretical aspects of the project of study of the role of the paradoxes of abstraction in communication. Psychiatr Res Rep Am Psychiatr Assoc 1955; 2: 39-51.

Wynne L, ed. The study of intrafamilial alignments and splits in exploratory family therapy. In: Acherman N, eds. Exploring the base for family therapy. New York: Family Service Association Of American; 1961. p. 95- 115.

Watzlawick P, Bavelas JB, eds. Pragmatics of Human Communication: A study of Interactional Patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W.W. Norton; 1967.

Watzlawick P, Weakland JH, eds. Change: Principles of Problem Formulation and Problem Resolution. New York: W.W. Norton; 1974.

Selvini Palazzoli M, ed. Paradox and Counter- Paradox. New York: Jason Aronson; 1978.

L'Abate L. A bibliography of paradoxical methods in psychotherapy of family systems. Fam Process 1978; 17: 95-98.

Dell PF. Some irreverent thoughts on paradox. Fam Process 1981; 20: 37-51.

8. Cronen VE, Johnson KM, Lannamann JW. Paradoxes, double binds, and reflexive loops: an alternative theoretical perspective. Fam Process 1982; 21: 91-112.

Dell PF. Why do we still call them "paradoxes"? Fam Process 1986; 25: 223-234.

Cecchin G. Hypothesizing, circularity, and neutrality revisited: an invitation to curiosity. Fam Process 1987; 26: 405-413.

Crowe M, Ridley JT, eds. Therapy with Couples: A Behavioral-systems Approach to Couple Relationship and Sexual Problems. London: Blackwell Science; 2000.

Selvini Palazzoli M, ed. Family Games: General Models of Psychotic Processes in the Family. London: Karnac Books; 1989.

Files
IssueVol 2 No 2 (2007) QRcode
SectionArticles
Keywords
Couple therapy Family therapy Iran Methods

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
1.
Mousavi A-S. Using Paradox in Family Therapy among Iranian Families: A Case Report. Iran J Psychiatry. 1;2(2):86-89.