Assessment of Semi-Structured Clinical Interview for Mobile Phone Addiction Disorder
Objective: The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) classified mobile phone addiction disorder under "impulse control disorder not elsewhere classified". This study surveyed the diagnostic criteria of DSM-IV-TR for the diagnosis of mobile phone addiction in correspondence with Iranian society and culture.
Method: Two hundred fifty students of Tehran universities were entered into this descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional study. Quota sampling method was used. At first, semi- structured clinical interview (based on DSM-IV-TR) was performed for all the cases, and another specialist re-evaluated the interviews. Data were analyzed using content validity, inter-scorer reliability (Kappa coefficient) and test-retest via SPSS18 software.
Results: The content validity of the semi- structured clinical interview matched the DSM –IV-TR criteria for behavioral addiction. Moreover, their content was appropriate, and two items, including "SMS pathological use" and "High monthly cost of using the mobile phone” were added to promote its validity. Internal reliability (Kappa) and test –retest reliability were 0.55 and r = 0.4 (p<0. 01) respectively.
Conclusion: The results of this study revealed that semi- structured diagnostic criteria of DSM-IV-TR are valid and reliable for diagnosing mobile phone addiction, and this instrument is an effective tool to diagnose this disorder.
1. Arashloo H. [The survey and comparision of internet on identity and mental health(in Persian)].Tehran: Azad University of Roodehen branch 2006.
2. Alavi SS, Ferdosi M, Jannatifard F, Eslami M, Alaghemandan H , Setare M. Behavioral Addiction versus Substance Addiction: Correspondence of Psychiatric and Psychological Views. Int J Prev Med 2012; 3: 290-294.
3. Kaplan BJ, Sadock VA. Synopsis of psychiatry:behavioral sciences/clinical psychiatry. 10th ed. NewYork: Guilford Press; 2007.
4. Peele S, Brodsky A. Love and Addiction. New-York: Taplinger; 1979.
5. Alavi SS, Janattifard F, Haghighi M and Eslami M.Comparison behavioral addiction symptoms withsubstance addiction correspondence view of psychiatryand psychology. Proceeding of the Iranian Congress of Addiction, Poisoning and Nursing Care; 2010 27-29Oct; Mashhad, Iran.
6. Griffiths M. Internet addiction: Internet fuels other addictions. Student British Medical Journal 1999; 7: 428-429.
7. Young KS. Internet addiction a new clinical phenomenon and its consequences. American behavioral scientist.2004; 48: 402-415.
8. Vaugeois P. Cyber-addiction: fundamentals andperspectives. Centre quebecois de lutte auxdependances. Quebec, Canada: Bibliotheqetarchievesnationals du Quebec; 2006.
9. Griffiths M. Nicotine, tobacco and addiction. Nature 1996; 384: 18.
10. Oreizi H, Farahani H.[Applied research methods in clinical psychology and counseling. (In Persian)]. 1st ed. Tehran: Danzheh Press; 2008.
11. Alavi SS, Maracy MR, Jannatifard F, Ojaghi R, Rezapour H. The psychometric properties of Cellular phone Dependency Questionnaire in students of Isfahan: A pilot study. Journal of Education and Health Promotion 2014; 3:71
12. Sahin S, Ozdemir K, Unsal A, Temiz N. Evaluation of mobile phone addiction level and sleep quality in university students. Pak J Med Sci 2013; 29: 913-918.
13. Zulkefly SN, Baharudin R. Mobile phone use amongst students in a university in Malaysia: its correlates and relationship to psychological health. European Journal of Scientific Research 2009; 27: 206-218.
14. Chóliz M. Mobile-phone addiction in adolescence: the test of mobile phone dependence (TMD). Prog Health Sci 2012; 2: 33-44.
15. Alavi SS, Jannatifard F, Eslami M, Rezapour H. [Evaluation of diagnostic criteria of DSM-IV-TR for diagnosis of Internet addiction disorder (in Persian)]. Zahedan J Res Med Sci (ZJRMS) 2011; 13: 31-35.
16. Alavi SS, JanatifardF.[Internet Addiction: concepts,definition and consequence of it(in Persian)]. Isfahan: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences; 2012.
17. Young KS. Cognitive behavior therapy with Internet addicts: treatment outcomes and implications. Cyberpsychol Behav 2007; 10: 671-679.
18. Albrecht U, Kirschner NE, Grusser SM. Diagnostic instruments for behavioural addiction: an overview. Psycho-social medicine 2007; 4: Doc11.
19. Choliz M. Mobile phone addiction: a point of issue. Addiction 2010; 105: 373-374.
20. Alavi S, Hashemian K, Janatifard F. [Identity status and mental health in internet-user students in Tehran University (in Persian)]. Journal of Research in Behavioral Sciences 2008; 6: 27-35.
21. Alavi SS, Jannatifard F, Maracy MR, Alaghemandan H , Setare M. Comparison of national and personal identity between person with internet addiction disorder and normal internet users. J Educ Health Promot 2014; 3: 42.
22. Mohammadi Kalhori S, Mohammadi MR, Alavi SS, Jannatifard F, Sepahbodi G, Baba Reisi M, et al. Validation and Psychometric Properties of Mobile Phone Problematic Use Scale (MPPUS) in University Students of Tehran. Iran J Psychiatry. 2015; 10: 25-31.
|Issue||Vol 11 No 2 (2016)|
|Addictive Behavior Assessment Cellular Phone Clinical Interview Students|
|Rights and permissions|
|This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.|